3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Garcia v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Garcia v. State Anchor | green | “fair assurance that the error did not have a substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury's verdict.” | 5 |
| 2 | Garcia v. State | green | “an appellate court may not reverse for non-constitutional error if the court, after examining the record as a whole, has fair assurance that the error did not have a substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury's verdict.” | 4 |
| 3 | Pittman v. State | green | “the erroneous admission of extraneous-offense evidence constitutes non- constitutional error.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.