4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. MARZETT.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. MARZETT Anchor | green | “questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way.” | 3 |
| 2 | State v. Menne | green | “whether a person has been taken into custody, detained or deprived of his freedom of action in a significant way is determined by an objective test on a case by case basis.” | 3 |
| 3 | State v. Menne | green | “whether there was probable cause to arrest prior to questioning, whether the statements and actions of the police indicate an intent to hold or restrain the accused, whether the accused reasonably believed he was restrained, and the extent to which the investigation had focused …” | 3 |
| 4 | State v. Alford | green | “custodial interrogation includes situations which fall short of an actual arrest but where the accused is questioned by the police in a setting which indicated that the accused has been deprived of his freedom of action in a significant way.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.