2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from John Pugno v. Blue Harvest Farms LLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | John Pugno v. Blue Harvest Farms LLC Anchor | green | “this court reviews a trial court's ruling on a motion for summary disposition de novo.” | 8 |
| 2 | Kennedy v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. | green | “because the test is objective, this court looks not to whether a particular plaintiff should have known that the condition was hazardous, but to whether a reasonable person in his or her position would have foreseen the danger.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.