3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ameristeel Corp. v. Clark.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ameristeel Corp. v. Clark Anchor | green | “an agency's interpretation of a statute it is charged with enforcing is entitled to great deference.” | 6 |
| 2 | City of Miami Beach v. Galbut | green | “counting employees of a foreign corporation who are working in other states is profoundly inconsistent with the parochial concerns of the fcra.” | 3 |
| 3 | Starr Tyme, Inc. v. Cohen | green | “when the language of a statute is unambiguous and conveys a clear and ordinary meaning, there is no need to resort to other rules of statutory construction; the plain language of the statute must be given effect.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.