2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re the Marriage of Hazen.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re the Marriage of Hazen Anchor | green | “the partners in the marriage are entitled to a just and equitable share of the property accumulated through their joint efforts,” | 7 |
| 2 | In Re Marriage of Fennelly & Breckenfelder | green | “equitable distribution depends upon the circumstances of each case,” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.