3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Douglas v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Douglas v. State Anchor | green | “the expert testimony from the defense could be rejected only if it did not square with other evidence in the case.” | 4 |
| 2 | Coday v. State | green | “the expert testimony from the defense could be rejected only if it did not square with other evidence in the case.” | 4 |
| 3 | Ault v. State | green | “even expert opinion evidence may be rejected if that evidence cannot be reconciled with other evidence in the case.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.