4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re McClure.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re McClure Anchor | green | “language is effective to exempt workers' compensation claims from judgments of creditors.” | 3 |
| 2 | Lyon Financial Services, Incor v. Illinois Paper and Copier Comp | green | “where the state supreme court has yet to have an opportunity to illuminate a clear path on the issue” | 3 |
| 3 | In re Michael D. | green | “it is never proper to depart from plain language by reading into a statute exceptions, limitations, or conditions that conflict with the clearly expressed legislative intent.” | 3 |
| 4 | Peggy Zahn v. North American Power & Gas, LL | green | “the case concerns a matter of vital public concern” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.