4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Tegeler v. Industrial Commission.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tegeler v. Industrial Commission Anchor | green | “by precluding a party from benefiting from its own wrongdoing” | 3 |
| 2 | Carey v. City of Rockford | green | “invoked to prevent fraud and injustice” | 3 |
| 3 | US Bank v. Avdic | green | “in general, this court reviews a circuit court's decision on a motion to strike an affidavit for an abuse of discretion, when the motion 'was made in conjunction with the court's ruling on a motion for summary judgment,' we employ a de novo standard of review with respect to th…” | 3 |
| 4 | Aasonn v. Delaney | green | “a complaint for common-law fraud 'must allege, with specificity and particularity, facts from which fraud is the necessary or probable inference, including what misrepresentations were made, when they were made, who made the misrepresentations and to whom they were made.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.