2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Shimanovsky v. General Motors Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shimanovsky v. General Motors Corp. Anchor | green | “the decision to impose a particular sanction under rule 219(c) is within the discretion of the trial court and, thus, only a clear abuse of discretion justifies reversal.” | 8 |
| 2 | In Re Marriage of Haken | green | “a trial court abuses its discretion when it acts arbitrarily, without conscientious judgment, or, in view of all of the circumstances, exceeds the bounds of reason and ignores recognized principles of law, resulting in substantial injustice.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.