3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Morrison v. Wagner.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Morrison v. Wagner Anchor | green | “when a case is refiled, the rule requires the court to consider the prior litigation in determining what discovery will be permitted, and what witnesses and evidence may be barred.” | 5 |
| 2 | Jones v. CHICAGO CYCLE CENTER | green | “in order for rule 219(e) to apply, there must be some misconduct on the plaintiff's part.” | 4 |
| 3 | Freeman v. Crays | green | “the misconduct of a party in the original action is merely a factor to be considered by the trial court in the refiled action when it determines what witnesses and evidence will be permitted.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.