4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Indeck North American Power Fund, L.P. v. Norweb PLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Indeck North American Power Fund, L.P. v. Norweb PLC Anchor | green | “a conspiracy is not an independent tort. where, as here, a plaintiff fails to state an independent cause of action underlying its conspiracy allegations, the claim for a conspiracy also fails.” | 3 |
| 2 | D'Attomo v. Baumbeck | green | “is consistent with ensuring that a prospective purchaser is fully informed and satisfied with matters affecting the condominium unit.” | 3 |
| 3 | D'Attomo v. Baumbeck | green | “the disclosure obliga- tions in section 22.1 would be ineffective, as a practical matter, if an aggrieved purchaser has no remedy against a 8 no. 18-2150 seller who conceals a requested disclosure until after the closing.” | 3 |
| 4 | D'Attomo v. Baumbeck | green | “the disclosure require- ments imposed by 22.1.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.