2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from v. Donald.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | v. Donald Anchor | green | “whether the relevant evidence, both direct and circumstantial, when viewed as a whole and in the light most favorable to the prosecution, is substantial and sufficient to support a conclusion by a reasonable mind that the defendant is guilty of the charge beyond a reasonable dou…” | 9 |
| 2 | People v. Duncan | green | “the due process clauses of the united states and colorado constitutions require proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt on each of the essential elements of a crime.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.