4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Jenkins.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Jenkins Anchor | green | “that has been marked as a court exhibit which was just the jury requesting certain items of evidence that had already been admitted and received in evidence, that they were provided with those items pursuant to discussions we had and what they were told before deliberations.” | 3 |
| 2 | People v. Lykes | green | “does not require notice to defendant in every instance of communication from the jury to the court” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Lykes | green | “section 310.30 does not require notice to defendant in every instance of communication from the jury to the court” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Gerrara | green | “since the note was not substantive, any failure by the trial court to comply with cpl 310.30 did not constitute a mode of proceedings error” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.