4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Rivera.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Rivera Anchor | green | “the manner and circumstances of the touching that occurred,” | 3 |
| 2 | People v. Gaston | green | “the victim onto a deserted floor in a large building where she was” | 3 |
| 3 | Jeffrey v. Koehler | neutral | “could not have been altered in any substantial way” | 3 |
| 4 | Uht v. Hazan & Sawyer Environmental Engineers & Scientists | green | “misconduct of the spectator in open court and the court's responsibility to maintain order” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.