4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Thorn Springs Ranch, Inc. v. Smith.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thorn Springs Ranch, Inc. v. Smith Anchor | green | “draw its own conclusions from the facts presented.” | 3 |
| 2 | Thorn Springs Ranch, Inc. v. Smith | green | “in favor of the judgment entered.” | 3 |
| 3 | Thorn Springs Ranch, Inc. v. Smith | green | “it is the province of the district court to weigh conflicting evidence and testimony and to judge the credibility of the witnesses.” | 3 |
| 4 | Independence Lead Mines Co. v. Hecla Mining Co. | green | “even if the evidence is conflicting.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.