3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Estes v. ConocoPhillips Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Estes v. ConocoPhillips Co. Anchor | green | “we presume that the legislature expressed its intent and intended what it expressed, and statutes are interpreted to attain that purpose and end, championing the broad public policy purposes underlying them.” | 6 |
| 2 | Public Service Co. of Oklahoma v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. Commission | green | “a presumption of correctness accompanies the commission's findings in matters it frequently adjudicates and in which it possesses expertise.” | 3 |
| 3 | Public Service Co. of Oklahoma v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. Commission | green | “because commission decisions often involve complex issues of economics, accounting, engineering, and other special knowledge.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.