4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Thomas Costello v. BeavEx, Incorporated.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thomas Costello v. BeavEx, Incorporated Anchor | green | “plaintiffs have demonstrated that common questions pre- dominate by making out a prima facie claim ... based on evi- dence common to the class.” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. Kimberly Smith Hastie | green | “infor- mation that identifies an individual.” | 3 |
| 3 | Jaime Gonzalez v. Owens Corning | green | “attempt to circum- vent the need to identify a common defect by, in effect, rede- fining the concept.” | 3 |
| 4 | Christine Dancel v. Groupon, Inc. | green | “un- doubtedly would include at least some undetermined num- ber of non-illinois and non-delaware citizens as class no. 19-1831 5 plaintiffs.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.