2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Smith.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Smith Anchor | green | “a departure from the presumptive risk level is warranted if there is 'an aggravating or mitigating factor of a kind, or to a degree, that is otherwise not adequately taken into account by the guidelines” | 9 |
| 2 | People v. Benitez | green | “facts previously . . . elicited at the time of entry of a plea of guilty shall be deemed established by clear and convincing evidence and shall not be relitigated” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.