3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Reno Club, Inc. v. Young Investment Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reno Club, Inc. v. Young Investment Co. Anchor | green | “there is no ambiguity or uncertainty in the meaning of the language employed in the option agreement. . . , and hence no room for judicial construction.” | 4 |
| 2 | Menter Co. v. Brock | green | “one who has nothing but his labor to sell, and is in urgent need of selling that, cannot well afford to raise any objection to any of the terms in the contract of employment 14 offered him, so long as the wages are acceptable.” | 4 |
| 3 | Traffic Control Services, Inc. v. United Rentals Northwest, Inc. | green | “employers commonly rely upon restrictive covenants. . . to safeguard important business interests.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.