6 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 98 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Halim v. Holder.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Halim v. Holder Anchor | green | “an applicant for withholding of removal will need to adduce a considerably larger quantum of individualized-risk evidence to prevail than would an asylum applicant” | 25 |
| 2 | Wakkary v. Holder | green | “an applicant for withholding of removal will need to adduce a considerably larger quantum of individualized-risk evidence to prevail than would an asylum applicant” | 24 |
| 3 | Shpetim Hoxha v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General | green | “an applicant for withholding of removal will need to adduce a considerably larger quantum of individualized-risk evidence” | 12 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.