4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from The New Georgia Project v. Brad Raffensperger.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The New Georgia Project v. Brad Raffensperger Anchor | green | “conducting an efficient election, maintaining order, quickly certifying election results, and preventing voter fraud” | 3 |
| 2 | League of Women Voters of Florida Inc. v. Florida Secretary of State | green | “as for the registration-delivery provision . . . legitimate motivations did exist.” | 3 |
| 3 | League of Women Voters of Florida Inc. v. Florida Secretary of State | green | “even if there were no evidence of voter fraud in florida, our precedents would not require it before a bill like s.b. 90 could be adopted” | 3 |
| 4 | League of Women Voters of Florida Inc. v. Florida Secretary of State | green | “the supreme court's guidance on this topic, permissive towards the state as it may be, does not require us to naively accept every invocation of voter fraud that is proffered regardless of its factual support.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.