2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Tatum v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tatum v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. Anchor | green | “the typicality requirement is met where the claims asserted by the named plaintiffs arise from the same course of conduct and are based on the same legal theories as the claims of the unnamed class members.” | 9 |
| 2 | Sandra Peters v. Aetna Incorporated | green | “a class representative must be part of the class and possess the same interest and suffer the same injury as the class members.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.