2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hillis v. Department of Ecology.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hillis v. Department of Ecology Anchor | green | “where there is room for two opinions, an action taken after due consideration is not arbitrary and capricious even though a reviewing court may believe it to be erroneous.” | 10 |
| 2 | Puget Sound Harvesters Ass'n v. Department of Fish & Wildlife | green | “a 50-50 allocation, made without regard to the attending facts and circumstances, would be arbitrary and capricious as well.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.