3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Femme Comp Inc. v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Femme Comp Inc. v. United States Anchor | green | “agencies are not required to conduct identical discussions with each offeror.” | 5 |
| 2 | Advanced Data Concepts, Inc. v. United States | green | “the contracting officer has broad discretion in conducting discussions.” | 4 |
| 3 | Structural Associates, Inc. v. United States | green | “discussions ... are designed to point out shortcomings in an offeror's proposal as judged from the standpoint of the government's stated needs, rather than from the standpoint of the proposal's relative competitiveness.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.