2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Garrett v. Cook.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Garrett v. Cook Anchor | green | “ourts may award attorney's fees under 1447(c) only where the removing party lacked an objectively reasonable basis for seeking removal.” | 4 |
| 2 | Marshall Huffman Virginia Newton v. Saul Holdings Limited Partnership, a Maryland Limited Partnership | green | “when a plaintiff files in state court a civil action over which the federal district courts would have original jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship, the defendant or defendants may remove the action to federal court . . . .” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.