3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bart v. Golub Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bart v. Golub Corp. Anchor | green | “(1) she is a member of a protected class; (2) she is qualified for her position; (3) she suffered an adverse employment action; and (4) the circumstances give rise to an inference of discrimination.” | 6 |
| 2 | King v. Aramark Services Inc. | green | “a reasonably close resemblance of the facts and circumstances of plaintiff's and comparator's cases.” | 3 |
| 3 | Bart v. Golub Corp. | green | “the plaintiff has established a prima facie case, the burden shifts to the employer to articulate some legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for its adverse action.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.