2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wooten v. Thaler.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wooten v. Thaler Anchor | green | “gives no clear answer to the question presented, let alone one in the petitioner's favor, 'it cannot be said that the state court unreasonably applied clearly established federal law.” | 6 |
| 2 | United States v. Martinez | green | “courts have observed that allowing a bare assertion of a right-to-testify violation to precipitate the further investment of judicial resources is problematic.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.