3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Widmar v. Vincent.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Widmar v. Vincent Anchor | green | “religious worship and discussion ... are forms of speech and association protected by the first amendment.” | 7 |
| 2 | Kaplan v. City of Burlington | green | “public forum doctrine would swallow up the establishment clause.” | 2 |
| 3 | Americans United For Separation Of Church And State v. City Of Grand Rapids | green | “thus, ... truly private religious expression in a truly public forum cannot be seen as endorsement by a reasonable observer.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.