3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kinslow v. Ratzlaff.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kinslow v. Ratzlaff Anchor | green | “a party's ability to relitigate an issue decided in a prior state court determination depends on the law of the state in which the earlier litigation occurred.” | 4 |
| 2 | Luben Industries, Inc. v. United States | green | “sufficiently firm to be accorded conclusive effect.” | 4 |
| 3 | Stafford v. Russell | green | “in the determination of a question of fact or law with reference to the same subject matter or transaction.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.