3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Correa v. Cruisers, a Division of KCS International, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Correa v. Cruisers, a Division of KCS International, Inc. Anchor | green | “obstinacy is to be judged in light of the overall circumstances of the particular case.” | 5 |
| 2 | Correa v. Cruisers, a Division of KCS International, Inc. | green | “a finding of obstinacy requires that the court determine a litigant to have been unreasonably adamant or stubbornly litigious, beyond the acceptable demands of the litigation, thereby wasting time and causing the court and the other litigants unnecessary expense and delay.” | 3 |
| 3 | Top Entertainment, Inc. v. Torrejon | green | “in the event any party or its lawyers has acted obstinately or frivolously, the court shall, in its judgment, impose on such person the payment of a sum for attorney's fees which the court decides corresponds to such conduct.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.