2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Dr. Robert L. Meinders, D.C. v. UnitedHealthcare, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dr. Robert L. Meinders, D.C. v. UnitedHealthcare, Inc. Anchor | green | “due process, we have cautioned, requires that a plaintiff be given an opportunity to respond to an argument or evidence raised as a basis to dismiss his or her claims.” | 5 |
| 2 | Paul E. Black v. Tic Investment Corp. Stratton Georgoulis, Individually and James H. Slife, Individually | green | “where new evidence is presented in a reply to a motion for summary judgment, the district court should not consider the new evidence without giving the movant an opportunity to respond.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.