2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Alan Shackleford.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Alan Shackleford Anchor | green | “sufficiently idiosyncratic to permit an inference of pattern for purposes of proof,” | 6 |
| 2 | United States v. Leon Hudson and Reginald Smith | green | “a singular strong resemblance to the pattern of the offense charged.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.