3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from James Armando Card v. Richard L. Dugger.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | James Armando Card v. Richard L. Dugger Anchor | green | “intertwined with an interpretation of federal law.” | 5 |
| 2 | Douglas v. Wainwright | green | “hold a hearing and articulate specific findings.” | 3 |
| 3 | Ex Parte Judd | green | “who was cleared from the courtroom, or whether the courtroom remained closed after the victim's testimony.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.