4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bustamante v. Mukasey.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bustamante v. Mukasey Anchor | green | “facially legitimate and bona fide reason” | 4 |
| 2 | Victoria Rosales Jesus Rosales Rebecca Rosales v. United States | green | “the intertwined jurisdictional facts must be resolved at trial by the trier of fact.” | 3 |
| 3 | Shelley Sommatino v. United States | green | “any alien who at any time knowingly has encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, or aided any other alien to enter or to try to enter the united states in violation of law is inadmissible.” | 2 |
| 4 | Bustamante v. Mukasey | green | “a highly constrained review solely to determine whether the consular official acted on the basis of a facially legitimate and bona fide reason.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.