4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Bill Lawrence.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Bill Lawrence Anchor | green | “after the amendment to the vwpa, restitution may be ordered for losses to persons harmed in the course of the defendant's scheme even beyond the counts of conviction.” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. Michael David Booth, United States of America v. Louis Robert Bories, United States of America v. Michael David Booth | green | “is thus not confined to harm caused by the particular offenses for which the defendant was convicted.” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. Brock-Davis | green | “a sentence that imposes an order of restitution is a final judgment.” | 3 |
| 4 | United States v. Mary Ann Grice | green | “because of similarities between the mvra and the vwpa, we may look to cases decided under the vwpa for guidance in interpreting the mvra.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.