2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Darwin Jay Copeland Anthony Antoine Hartwell.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Darwin Jay Copeland Anthony Antoine Hartwell Anchor | green | “this court reviews a constitutional challenge to a defendant's sentence de novo wherever the defendant preserves the claim for appellate review.” | 8 |
| 2 | United States v. Walter Meade Pugh, Jr. (03-3241) and Tyreese Pugh (03-3243) | green | “after we have decided a new rule in the case selected, the integrity of judicial review requires that we apply that rule to all similar cases pending on direct review.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.