4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hill v. Weber.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hill v. Weber Anchor | green | “when witnesses give conflicting testimony, we do not decide to believe a witness different from the one believed by the district court.” | 3 |
| 2 | In Re GRH | green | “an individual who is shown to have engaged in sexually predatory conduct and who has a congenital or acquired condition that is manifested by a sexual disorder, a personality disorder, or other mental disorder or dysfunction that makes that individual likely to engage in further…” | 3 |
| 3 | State v. Voisine | green | “use the fullness of their education, experience and resources available to them in order to determine if an individual poses a threat to society.” | 3 |
| 4 | State v. Voisine | green | “under the third prong of the commitment analysis, evaluating psychologists can 'use the fullness of their education, experience and resources available to them in order to determine if an individual poses a threat to society.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.