3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Marks v. St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Marks v. St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital Anchor | green | “an inseparable or integral part of the rendition of medical services.” | 4 |
| 2 | Yamada v. Friend | green | “allowing the claim to be split or spliced into a multitude of other causes of action with differing standards of care, damages, and procedures would contravene the legislature's explicit requirements.” | 4 |
| 3 | Holguin v. Laredo Regional Medical Center, L.P. | green | “unwanted and offensive sexual advances” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.