6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 96 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State ex rel. Graham v. Findlay Municipal Court.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State ex rel. Graham v. Findlay Municipal Court Anchor | neutral | “the requirements of r.c. 2969.25 are mandatory, and failure to comply with them subjects an inmate's action to dismissal.” | 43 |
| 2 | State v. Henton (Slip Opinion) | green | “compliance with r.c. 2969.25(a) is mandatory, and a failure to comply warrants dismissal of the action.” | 17 |
| 3 | State ex rel. Roden v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr. (Slip Opinion) | green | “affirmed dismissals of inmate actions when the inmate had failed to submit the account statement required by r.c. 2969.25(c)(1).” | 14 |
| 4 | State ex rel. Roden v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr. (Slip Opinion) | green | “does not include a statement setting forth the balance in an inmate account for each of the preceding six months” | 10 |
| 5 | Brown v. Rogers | green | “commitment papers are necessary for a complete understanding of the petition,” | 7 |
| 6 | Blankenship v. Blackwell | green | “application for the writ of mandamus must be in the name of the state on the relation of the person applying.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.