Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 4,500 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation Anchor | green | “where the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the non-moving party, there is no 'genuine issue for trial.” | 2,556 |
| 2 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation | green | “must come forward with 'specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.” | 1,462 |
| 3 | Horowitz v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co. | green | “facts that could alter the outcome are 'material,' and disputes are 'genuine' if evidence exists from which a rational person could conclude that the position of the person with the burden of proof on the disputed issue is correct.” | 259 |
| 4 | Pennsylvania Coal Ass'n v. Babbitt | green | “view the underlying facts and all reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion.” | 223 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.