3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from MacDonald v. Korum Ford.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MacDonald v. Korum Ford Anchor | green | “(a) not well grounded in fact, or (b) not warranted by (i) existing law or (ii) a good faith argument for the alteration of existing law.” | 6 |
| 2 | MacDonald v. Korum Ford | green | “a filing is 'baseless' when it is '(a) not well grounded in fact, or (b) not warranted by (i) existing law or (ii) a good faith argument for the alteration of existing law.” | 3 |
| 3 | Hicks v. Edwards | green | “(a) not well grounded in fact, or (b) not warranted by (i) existing law or (ii) a good faith argument for the alteration of existing law.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.