3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Smith v. Whatcom County District Court.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smith v. Whatcom County District Court Anchor | green | “the contempt proceeding authorized by rcw 10.01.180 is civil.” | 5 |
| 2 | State v. Prado | green | “intended the violation of the condition to relate to the original prosecution, rather than constitute a new prosecution.” | 3 |
| 3 | State v. Watson | green | “should be deemed punishment for the original crime.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.