3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Foster.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Foster Anchor | green | “resolve all disputed facts in favor of the state, indulge all reasonable inferences in support of the verdict, and disregard all evidence and inferences to the contrary.” | 4 |
| 2 | State v. Kersey | green | “merit of evidence that may have supported a verdict to the contrary.” | 4 |
| 3 | Commonwealth v. Osborne | green | “the stronger the inference of guilt, the less significant is the necessity for evidence of relating back. conversely, the weaker the inference of guilt, the more vital is the necessity for evidence of relating back an accused's bac test result to the time of driving.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.