2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rios-Jimenez v. Principi.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rios-Jimenez v. Principi Anchor | green | “attendance is an essential function of any job.” | 7 |
| 2 | Castro-Medina v. Procter & Gamble Commercial Co. | green | “gross attendance problems can prevent a disabled person from being qualified for a position even when the attendance problem is related in whole or in part to the disability.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.