3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from McIntosh v. McIntosh.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McIntosh v. McIntosh Anchor | green | “when it incorrectly chooses, interprets, or applies the law.” | 5 |
| 2 | Zawilanski v. Marshall | green | “orders concerning grandparenting time must be affirmed on appeal unless the trial court's findings were against the great weight of the evidence, the court committed a palpable abuse of discretion, or the court made a clear legal error on a major issue.” | 3 |
| 3 | Brinkley v. Brinkley | green | “if two fit parents (with the exception of certain circumstances that are not present in this case) both oppose visitation, their joint opposition effectively creates an irrebuttable -4- presumption that denial of grandparenting time will not create a substantial risk of harm to …” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.