4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 95 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Harold Pinker, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Roche Holdings Ltd. Harold Pinker.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harold Pinker, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Roche Holdings Ltd. Harold Pinker Anchor | green | “bears the burden of demonstrating the facts that establish personal jurisdiction.” | 41 |
| 2 | Dayhoff Inc. v. H.J. Heinz Co. | green | “takes the allegations of the complaint as true.” | 23 |
| 3 | Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. v. Mylan Inc. | green | “resolves the jurisdictional issue in the absence of an evidentiary hearing and without the benefit of discovery, the plaintiff need only establish a prima facie case of personal jurisdiction.” | 17 |
| 4 | Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. v. Mylan Inc. | green | “may always revisit the issue of personal jurisdiction if later revelations reveal that the facts alleged in support of jurisdiction remain in dispute.” | 14 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.