3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cantu v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cantu v. State Anchor | green | “served no other purpose than to inflame the jury.” | 5 |
| 2 | Powell v. State | green | “a legitimate basis for the trial court's ruling.” | 3 |
| 3 | Powell v. State | green | “the court of appeals found the evidence was relevant to a noncharacter purpose under rule 404(b) because it tended to show motive, which in turn tended to show the elemental fact of identity.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.