3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Commonwealth v. Lee.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commonwealth v. Lee Anchor | green | “adjudication of guilt renders moot any allegation that the commonwealth failed to establish a prima facie case” | 5 |
| 2 | Commonwealth v. Torres | green | “based on commonwealth v. torres, 564 pa. 219 , 766 a.2d 342, 345 (pa. 2001) (explaining that a fact-finder's mere disbelief of the defendant's testimony going forward with the evidence relative to a justification defense is 'no substitute for the proof the commonwealth was requi…” | 3 |
| 3 | Com. v. Lineman, A. | green | “where a defendant plausibly argues he did not intentionally possess the firearm.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.