2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Hutnik.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Hutnik Anchor | green | “trial court erroneously exercises its discretion when its decision is based on a misapplication or erroneous view of the law.” | 4 |
| 2 | Matter of Settlement for Personal Injuries Konicki | green | “trial court erroneously exercises its discretion when its decision is based on a misapplication or erroneous view of the law.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.