3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Garza v. Exel Logistics, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Garza v. Exel Logistics, Inc. Anchor | green | “covered by workers' compensation insurance coverage” | 5 |
| 2 | Ford, Inc. v. Collins Ford, Inc. | green | “one is not required to wait until the rule is attempted to be enforced against him before he may resort to declaratory relief.” | 3 |
| 3 | Mid-Century Insurance Co. v. Texas Workers' Compensation Commission | green | “the legislature, in fact, carefully balanced the competing interests of injured employees, employers, and insurance carriers in an attempt to create a viable compensation system, all within constitutional limitations” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.